Solutions — AI Governance

AI Governance Documentation That Satisfies Regulators.

For CTOs, CISOs, Chief AI Officers, and compliance leaders facing board pressure and regulatory requirements around AI risk.

See How It Works ↓

Self-paced

No scheduling or coordination required. Work through the program on your own schedule.

No AI agents in your assessment

Built by practitioners. Structured responses only.

Board-ready findings

Auditable analysis mapped to frameworks regulators recognize.

The Situation

AI governance requirements are arriving from multiple directions simultaneously. Most organizations aren't ready.

🇪🇺

EU AI Act Compliance

The EU AI Act is in force. Organizations deploying AI systems in the EU—or to EU customers—face documentation, transparency, and risk management requirements that a self-assessment checklist won't satisfy. Regulators expect formal AI risk assessments.

🏛️

Board and Audit Committee Pressure

Boards and audit committees are asking about AI risk exposure—how AI is being used, what controls exist, and whether the organization's governance program is adequate. "We're working on it" is no longer an acceptable response.

📋

Regulatory and Industry Expectations

Financial services regulators, healthcare agencies, and others are issuing guidance on AI risk management. NIST AI RMF 1.0 is becoming a de facto standard. Organizations without documented AI governance are increasingly exposed during examinations and audits.

What AI Governance Leaders Actually Need

Documentation that holds up to regulator scrutiny and board questions—built for the pace of AI deployment.

  • Documented AI risk assessment across the model lifecycle
  • Governance gap analysis covering data practices, oversight structures, and human control mechanisms
  • Findings mapped to NIST AI RMF 1.0 and EU AI Act requirements
  • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 alignment documentation
  • MITRE ATLAS and OWASP LLM Top 10 security risk coverage
  • Executive Report for board and audit committee presentation
  • Practitioner Report for compliance, legal, and technical teams
  • Assessment Comparison Report showing governance progress between runs
  • Self-paced. Re-run as your AI footprint grows.

How VeloRisk Addresses It

Structured AI governance findings designed to satisfy regulators, boards, and auditors.

Full-Lifecycle AI Risk Coverage

VeloRisk's AI Risk Assessment evaluates your organization's AI use cases, deployment practices, governance structures, and oversight mechanisms—across the full model lifecycle, not just a point-in-time snapshot of active systems.

The Frameworks Regulators Reference

Findings are mapped to NIST AI RMF 1.0, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023, MITRE ATLAS, OWASP LLM Top 10, OECD AI Principles, and NIST CSF 2.0. The same frameworks your board, regulators, and auditors will ask about.

Re-Run as AI Evolves

AI risk profiles change fast—new models deployed, new use cases, new regulatory guidance. Re-run your assessment when your AI footprint changes and use the Comparison Report to document progress for board and compliance reporting. Unlimited reassessments are included with the Annual Program subscription.

The Right Program for Your Situation

Designed specifically for AI governance—not a repurposed enterprise risk checklist.

AI Risk Program

Comprehensive AI governance assessment covering model lifecycle risk, data practices, oversight structures, and security exposure—with findings mapped to the frameworks regulators and boards expect.

EU AI Act ISO/IEC 23894:2023 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 MITRE ATLAS NIST AI RMF 1.0 NIST CSF 2.0 OECD AI Principles OWASP LLM Top 10
Learn More →

Get the AI Governance Documentation Your Board and Regulators Expect

Mapped to NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, and more.

See the AI Risk Program →